If you found this answer helpful, please add your vote by
clicking here.
Readers' Comments (2) - To post a comment please register or login
.
Comment by glenn at 9:24pm on 23 Jan 2013:
Nucleus may be transparant in costs but not in terms of ownership. IFAs effectively part own Nucleus and recieve more shares as the amount of assets they place with Nucleus increases. Justin is correct that there are cheaper platforms available and any adviser who recommends them has a clear conflict of interest.
Did your adviser mention that to you humpo99? Hope so as they're required to by the FSA!
Comment by justin at 9:42pm on 23 Jan 2013:
Thanks @glenn, a good point I should have mentioned. Doesn't affect the Nucleus platforms itself from a consumer point of view, but there's a risk it may influence advisers to use it over other platforms without making sure it's really in their client's best interests.