Image
feature
Other Candid sites

Candid Financial Advice
Financial advice for a fraction of the usual cost.

Compare Fund Platforms
The UK's only fund platform comparison site for private investors.

Calculator over 80 Calculators!

Covering almost all your money needs - use them.

Salary Tax

Calculator How much of your salary and/or pension income is the taxman taking? Use this calculator to find out.

Random Jargon

Introductory Bonus Rate Savings Accounts

A marketing trick used by some banks and building societies to offer a high initial savings rate, which is likely to fall when the bonus ceases.

Ask Justin

Ask Justin

| Printable version | A A A |


Invest in Aberdeen Latin American Equity fund?

Investment | Unit Trusts Helpful? 16

Asked by Islaylassie, submitted 31 January 2011.

Open Quote How would you rate Aberdeen's new Latin American fund, due to be launched on 9 February, and would you consider it too risky for a 65-year-old who already had exposure to Emerging Markets funds in a well-diversified portfolio but who intended to stay invested for at least the next 5 to 10 years?
End Quote

Answered by Justin on 02 February 2011

Latin America is very fortunate in that it sits on a vast supply of natural resources, including energy and metals, while also having a good climate and plenty of space to grow crops. Political troubles and lack of demand have, at times, stifled economic growth in the region. But soaring demand for oil, metals and food in recent years has led to a Latin American boom, while more robust political systems have, to some extent, helped translate the commodities boom into more income for a growing proportion of the population.

This last point is a really important one moving forwards. As Latin American populations become more prosperous, then so will their demand for consumer items such as phones, bank accounts, credit cards, food, cars, white goods and other consumer goods and services. This growth in domestic consumer demand often gives emerging economies a 'second wind', helping to stimulate further economic growth in addition to their bread and butter industries.

But while the longer term argument is quite convincing, there's a lot that could go wrong meanwhile.

Much of the increased demand for commodities has come from other emerging countries, predominantly China. If a global slowdown causes these countries to reduce the pace of their infrastructure development then demand for commodities will fall. This would hurt Latin American revenues which in turn could slow the growth in domestic demand as the population will have less money to spend.

Latin American countries are also at the mercy of the US dollar exchange rate, as commodities are usually traded in dollars. For example, a weak dollar means these countries earn less when dollar revenues are exchanged into their local currency.

And while political stability has improved, it would naive to think Latin American countries are anywhere near as politically robust as developed countries in the West. There's still scope for corruption, poor management and civil unrest to derail their ascent from time to time.

Provided you're comfortable riding out shorter term storms, then I think an investment over 10+ years is very sensible - as even the above issues probably won't do much to affect long term growth potential in Latin America.

As you've already invested in emerging markets funds then check how much of that is invested in Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Chile and Peru are the likely markets). If it's over one third of your emerging markets exposure then I wouldn't see a compelling reason to invest more unless you're particularly bullish about the region.

As for the fund itself, it's a unit trust that will primarily invest in Brazil and Mexico (estimated at 65% and 25% exposure respectively). It will be managed by Fiona Manning, who has not had direct responsibility for a fund before. But I'm not too concerned about this as Aberdeen runs funds on a team basis and is pretty successful at doing so in emerging markets. Their existing track record in Latin America is good based on a US listed fund, albeit the named manager on that fund is different.

As with other Aberdeen emerging markets funds, the focus will be on investing in high quality companies that are likely to weather storms better than others, which is re-assuring. But make no mistake, this is still a high risk fund in the scheme of things, so don't bet your shirt.

If you want to invest in Latin America I don't see a reason not to use this fund. Annual charges are steep at 1.75%, but then worthy alternatives such as First State Latin America charge the same so it sadly seems to go with the territory.

Aberdeen's own Latin American Income investment trust is also worth considering as an alternative, as the income yield of around 4.3% (and around 1/3rd fixed interest exposure) should help reduce volatility. Charges are still high (1.9% TER despite an annual charge of only 1%) and at the time of writing the trust's share price is trading at a premium of nearly 6% to its net asset value, but neither should be a big hindrance long term. You can read more about this investment trust in my earlier answer here.

Aberdeen is launching the Latin American Equity fund on 9 February, although Hargreaves Lansdown has an exclusive allowing you to invest before then. Unlike investment trusts it makes little difference whether you invest at launch or thereafter for unit trusts/oeics, so I wouldn't feel rushed into making up your mind.

Good luck whatever you decide!


Please note this answer does not constitute a recommendation or financial advice and should not be relied upon when making specific investment or other financial decisions. You should always undertake your own research into whether a product or service is appropriate for your needs and, if necessary, use a qualified professional adviser.

If you found this answer helpful, please add your vote by clicking here.


Readers' Comments (3) - To post a comment please register or login .


Comment by brianc at 1:03am on 04 Feb 2011:

This is probably a very stupid question -- but why are Aberdeen issuing a new Unit Trust with a new fund manager when they already have an existing Investment Trust covering that region.

What would be the deciding factors on picking one or the other? Although I only hold Unit Trusts everything I read lately seems to say Investment Trusts are better - they are cheaper and show better returns over the long term.


Comment by justin at 10:21am on 04 Feb 2011:

Not a stupid question, I suspect it's because demand for Latin American investments seems to be picking up and offering a unit trust widens Aberdeen's potential market. Many financial advisers shun investment trusts, often due to a combination of no commission being paid and not having the necessary permissions to recommend them, so offering a unit trust opens up his market for Aberdeen (they already seem to have struck a pre-launch deal with Hargreaves Lansdown!). Offering a unit trust also makes it easier for Aberdeen to feature the fund on fund supermarkets - which again should boost sales.

Although the investment trust has a 1% annual charge vs the unit trust's 1.75%, total annual charges (total expense ratio) seem to be the same at around 1.9%. Although Aberdeen names individuals as manager, their funds are fund a team basis so the quality of management should be the same on both funds.

Aside from structure, the main difference is that the investment trust aims to produce a reasonable income (including around 1/3rd exposure to fixed interest - which should reduce volatility) whereas the unit trust is a growth fund.

I wouldn't say investments trusts are necessarily better than unit trusts, each has their pros and cons. The main thing to focus on is picking the right fund for you, whether it's an investment or unit trust is a secondary consideration (in my view).

Hope this helps.


Comment by brianc at 2:12pm on 05 Feb 2011:

As always, your comments help a great deal. Thanks a lot.